RANKED · Round 3/2

burger is bad

◆ Crowd · Round 30 votes

50%50%

🇮🇳For

Against🇫🇷

For · R125/80

burger is bad because it has overly processed ingredients like oils, processed meat, sauces which contains harmful anti-nutrients or chemicals

Clarity

/20

Evidence

/20

Logic

/20

Rebuttal

/20

⚖ Fallacy · Appeal to Fear

"harmful anti-nutrients or chemicals"

This phrase attempts to evoke an emotional response of fear regarding 'harmful' substances without providing specific evidence, examples, or scientific backing for their presence or impact.

Fallacy Penalty-5

◆ The Oracle Speaks

Your argument clearly states its position and identifies ingredients it considers problematic. To significantly strengthen your next argument, provide specific details or evidence for your claims, such as naming particular 'harmful anti-nutrients or chemicals' and explaining their specific negative effects or citing sources that classify certain ingredients as 'overly processed' and why that is detrimental.

Against · R1

there are ways in which a burger can be made using organic ingredients, so its healthy

Round II

For · R2

burger also is very addictive and can lead people away from more organic foods

Against · R2

burger is healthy, it just had bread, meat, veggies etc all of which can be sourced locally

Final Verdict

For

Against

The verdict stands. The Oracle rules FOR.

Share on X ⬇ Share the receiptReturn to Arena →