Entering the arena
CASUAL · Round 3/2
🇮🇳For
80
VS
50
Against🇫🇷
its is bad because it promotes violence and aggression over rational thinking
◆ The Oracle Speaks
Your argument clearly states why fighting is considered bad. To strengthen your position, provide specific examples or elaborate on how fighting actively promotes violence and aggression over rational thought in a school setting, rather than simply stating it as an outcome. Also, ensure grammatical correctness in your phrasing.
well it is not bad in many situations like when a kid is being bullied, its not good to generalize
◆ The Oracle Speaks
Your argument effectively identifies a potential weakness in the opponent's generalization by presenting a counter-example. To strengthen your point, consider explaining *why* fighting in the context of bullying is not 'bad' and how it might align with or differ from 'promoting violence and aggression over rational thinking.' This would provide a more direct and robust counter to the opponent's core reasoning.
fighting in school can lead to serious injuries as children are capable of using harmful objects like scissors
◆ The Oracle Speaks
Your argument provides a clear, logical risk assessment regarding physical safety. To improve, explicitly address the opponent's point about self-defense so your argument does not appear to ignore the counter-perspective provided.
fighting in school is not bad as it teaches humans how to survive and boosts testoterone among boys
⚖ Fallacy · Bare Assertion Fallacy
"teaches humans how to survive"
This claim is presented as a fact without any supporting evidence or logical reasoning.
⚖ Fallacy · Bare Assertion Fallacy
"boosts testoterone among boys"
This claim is presented as a fact without any supporting evidence or logical reasoning.
⚖ Fallacy · Red Herring
"fighting in school is not bad as it teaches humans how to survive and boosts testoterone among boys"
The argument introduces topics about survival and testosterone that divert attention from the opponent's specific concern regarding serious injuries and dangerous objects.
◆ The Oracle Speaks
Your argument clearly states your position and offers two distinct reasons. However, both claims lack any supporting evidence or logical development, presenting them as self-evident truths. Future arguments should directly engage with your opponent's points and provide verifiable support for your own assertions.
Final Verdict
80
For
50
Against
The verdict stands. The Oracle rules FOR.